I just finished reading "The Tomb of Hercules", a novel by Andy McDermott. Apparently he wrote a book prior to this one, which I missed. Having finished this one, though, I don't think I've missed much.
The book jacket described the story, to paraphrase/condense, as basically an Indiana Jones type thing with a female protagonist. James Rollins has written wonderful adventure novels with fully believable female characters. Douglas Preston and Lincoln Child have done the same. However...
Let me just state for the record that I'm not what you'd call a feminazi. I don't go out of my way to look for reasons to be offended at a man's behavior. But this male authors' treatment of the two female leads just chaps my hide. The "good" female lead apparently had the brains to head a museum archaeology department, yet sulked like a child when her bf couldn't read her mind. And apparently it was a point in her favor that she thought getting a five hundred dollar haircut made sense. The "evil" female lead, by her own admission, apparently turned evil as a direct result of going without her family's wealth in order to marry the "good" female lead's now-bf.
So...it's okay to be smart, as long as you have a man to back you up. And it's okay to live on Daddy's wealth, just as it's okay to plot to overthrow the world currency markets once you don't have access to said wealth anymore. So you can be "strong" and "smart" enough make those kinds of plans, as long as you have at least one man around to do the heavy lifting. But it's apparently not okay to be strong and smart enough to, I dunno, take care of yourself without seeking/needing a man's approval?